At their most basic, talent management systems must address four integrated functions: recruiting, onboarding,...
performance and development, and compensation.
But because talent management software packages are also part of a talent management lifecycle, they must also fit in with an organization’s existing IT systems and business processes while adding value now and in the future. The many adjectives vendors use to describe their talent management systems’ capabilities -- extensible, adaptable, resilient, scalable, and modular -- point to a common theme of planning for change.
Among other things, planning for change means reviewing the current environment and broader trends affecting the enterprise, mitigating risk, and remaining open to new opportunities.
Each company has both a tradition of project management and a unique set of requirements that must be understood and met. Here are several more perspectives to consider during the company’s product selection process.
Determining talent management system requirements
Before searching the market for talent management software, an organization should take stock of itself. A company profile provides the essential data points for review. These include the company size, financial record and projections, current and planned markets, employee demographics, geographic scope, and specific legal and regulatory considerations.
More on talent management systems
Understand talent analytics
Read about talent management software trends
Learn the benefits of talent management software
These elements establish a framework for the project manager, consultant, or vendor to consider when evaluating the options in talent management systems.
In addition, current pain points should be gathered in a formal requirements process, a review of performance metrics for HR personnel and HR information systems, or at least a glance at angry emails from internal and external users over the past two years. Anecdotal data, while never sufficient for a thorough planning process, still provides a valuable reality check on a talent management system’s capabilities.
With requirements in place for scalability, system configurations, cost, performance, the quality of current software, existing bottlenecks in process or decision flows, and turnover rates, the company can perform a quantitative analysis of each option.
Broader trends affecting talent management system selection
Each business is affected by larger market, demographic, social, and geopolitical forces that can determine which talent management system is the best choice.
Pending legislation regarding the classification of exempt and non-exempt employees, the number of H1-B visas, or incentive programs for hiring veterans can impact a company’s HR processes and systems.
What’s more, the Baby Boomers are nearing retirement. Some may leave, while others may seek consulting roles or positions that require less travel. In other segments of the age spectrum, education and work experience differ not only in degree, but in kind. “Millennials” (the generation born in the late 20th century) may adapt more successfully to online training programs and social media tools. This can reduce the need for classroom or one-to-one training but put increased demand on the quality of online materials and social media-based training software.
Like pretty much every category of software nowadays, talent management systems are being transformed by cloud computing. Although it’s rarely a good idea to choose a technology before reviewing all the options, cloud-based talent management systems are rapidly becoming the only meaningful option. As Forrester Research’s Paul Hamerman wrote, Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle and a long-standing critic of Software as a Service (SaaS), eventually yielded to the trend and announced Oracle’s acquisition of Taleo.
An increasingly popular cloud computing option is Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), which can put corporate data in the cloud while retaining traditional desktop client software, minimizing the disruption to end users.
Finally, during the software selection process, it’s important to identify risks not only for their likelihood, but also their potential impact. Weather-related damage is generally rare, but can be devastating. Regulatory changes are another risk that affects HR activities. They are highly likely, but usually localized.
Change and the talent management lifecycle
Business process management (BPM) techniques can provide a formalized and yet flexible way of describing in words and pictures what the talent management system will do and how it will do it. This helps to ensure that all stakeholders have a common understanding of the goals and capabilities of the new talent management system. The Object Management Group provides helpful documentation and examples of modeling techniques and products that can aid in talent management software selection.
The organization’s LMS may get its first serious workout during talent management system deployment. Experts advise looking for vendors that provide high-quality training in the modes that are appropriate for the organization, be it online, on video, or in person.
Talent management system vendors and unintended consequences
Vendors within and outside the talent management software market aren’t sitting still. Mergers and acquisitions are regularly in the news, which can impact talent management software selection in a couple of ways. Vendors can create more complete product solutions, making a single-vendor solution more attractive, or they can acquire new companies with new products that create unexpected side effects.
For example, Salesforce.com recently made an entry into the talent management system market when it acquired Rypple; a social media-based performance management company. Not only does this mark a change in the CRM vendor’s product scope, it also brings social media elements and “gamification” to Salesforce’s performance review process.
Naomi Bloom, managing partner of Bloom & Wallace, an HR technology consultancy based in Fort Myers, Fla., said social media interactions can bring the small-office experience to the enterprise and a more clear-eyed appraisal of an employee’s performance. “It’s hard to hide in a world gone social,” Bloom said.
When Salesforce.com’s bought Rypple, an established vendor from another market entered the talent management product space, bringing with it a component that can dramatically change the way performance reviews are conducted.
Such talent management system mergers come with their won risks, however. They can take time not only to become official, but functional. An acquisition that’s announced this month might become official in months, but it may take a year or two before integrated product offerings are available. Further, as Forrester’s Paul Hamerman notes, in Oracle’s case, a series of acquisitions can lead to product overlaps that the vendor will eventually have to resolve.
Once a talent management software vendor is chosen, the exact details of the business arrangement can greatly affect the system’s effect on the talent management lifecycle. Consider the barriers to exit as well as the barriers to entry. Bloom observed that there are contractual and practical considerations. A provision akin to a prenuptial agreement can ensure an orderly transition. Licenses and service contracts with vendors and systems integrators, custom code agreements, and any third-party agreements need to include provisions for a graceful exit. Be certain to escrow the source code and documentation for any customizations performed by the vendor or subcontractors, Bloom advised.
Besides considering conversion requirements of importing current data and configurations to the new talent management system, it’s important to recognize the employee transition costs. New systems are productivity killers at first, as people unlearn old procedures and learn new ones. Social media-based learning can help to spread best practices as they emerge during the transition.
Finally, remember that systems usually grow asymmetrically. When discussing scalability with potential software vendors, project managers plan only for growth, often the sudden variety. But the possibility of business contraction must also be considered. Cloud-based alent management systems and subscription software can add resilience to capacity planning, according to HR technology experts.
Staying open to the possibilities
Ten years ago, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn didn’t exist. Amazon was just getting started as a cloud service provider. Salesforce.com had 3% of its current customer base. The major talent management software vendors were also new and, at that time, typically niche, “point solution” providers.
The concept and the implementation of fully integrated talent management systems are continuing to evolve, incorporating new features within the HR realm and adapting to the rapidly evolving social web. Just as risk mitigation requires planning for things to go wrong, staying open to change means being prepared to act if things go better than expected.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Karl Hakkarainen is a Massachusetts-based freelance technical writer and blogger.